• TTH4P@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I have to tag you as “temporarily embarrassed billionaire”. Sorry you don’t get the point I was trying to make.

    • OldManBOMBIN@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      19 hours ago

      I know what you’re saying - no deed performed by a billionaire can be seen as good, because it was performed by a billionaire. But you’re wrong.

      • TTH4P@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        19 hours ago

        Ok, let me engage you on this. If it’s a good deed performed with blood money, or with money earned on the backs of a genocide, or with money earned by ripping thousands of families off over and over for a long time, is it a good deed?

        • OldManBOMBIN@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 hours ago

          If it’s a good deed performed with blood money…

          In that question, you’ve proven my point.

          The deed is good even if the funds are not. The ends do not justify the means, but the means do not nullify the ends.

        • tomi000@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          14 hours ago

          So theres no need for me to donate my blood money as that would be a bad deed right? Good for me.