Was looking through my office window at the data closet and (due to angle, objects, field of view) could only see one server light cluster out of the 6 racks full. And thought it would be nice to scale everything down to 2U. Then day-dreamed about a future where a warehouse data center was reduced to a single hypercube sitting alone in the vast darkness.

  • InverseParallax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    20 hours ago

    It made some sense before virtualization for job separation.

    Then docker/k8s came along and nuked everything from orbit.

    • MNByChoice@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      VMs were a thing in 2013.

      Interestinly, Docker was released in March 2013. So it might have prevented a better company from trying the same thing.

      • InverseParallax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Yes, but they weren’t as fast, vt-x and the like were still fairly new, and the VM stacks were kind of shit.

        Yeah, docker is a shame, I wrote a thin stack on lxc, but BSD Jails are much nicer, if only they improved their deployment system

    • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      19 hours ago

      The other use case was for hosting companies. They could sell “5 servers” to one customer and “10 servers” to another and have full CPU/memory isolation. I think that use case still exists and we see it used all over the place in public cloud hyperscalers.

      Meltdown and Spectre vulnerabilities are a good argument for discrete servers like this. We’ll see if a new generation of CPUs will make this more worth it.

      • InverseParallax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        18 hours ago

        128-192 cores on a single epyc makes almost nothing worth it, the scaling is incredible.

        Also, I happen to know they’re working on even more hardware isolation mechanisms, similar to sriov but more enforced.

        • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          15 hours ago

          128-192 cores on a single epyc makes almost nothing worth it, the scaling is incredible.

          Sure, which is why we haven’t seen a huge adoption. However, in some cases it isn’t so much an issue of total compute power, its autonomy. If there’s a rogue process running on one of those 192 cores and it can end up accessing the memory in your space, its a problem. There are some regulatory rules I’ve run into that actually forbid company processes on shared CPU infrastructure.

          • InverseParallax@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            14 hours ago

            There are, but at that point you’re probably buying big iron already, cost isn’t an issue.

            Sun literally made their living from those applications for a long while.