• demunted@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Agree. Elon… Err Doge will change regulatory rules until they run out of money.

  • ramsgrl909@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I am excited, this is what my husband and I have been waiting for - a regular vehicle with no bells and whistles just to raise the price

  • Revan343@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Damn, an electric truck I might actually want. It’s a shame it’s made in America

  • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago

    they lost me at automatic high beams. we don’t need more cars on the road with LED high beams blinding everybody within two kilometers

    • Zenith@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      Automatic means they turn on and off automatically so it actually cuts down on the problem you’re describing

      • Lemming_Observer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 hours ago

        That’s the theory and it sounded great in the adverts. But in my experience, “automatic” means on by default and most folks don’t think about them, creating the problem- we’re all blind because the damn things come on too much. To work properly, they’ll have to know where the city limits are, not just trigger at “x” lumens level. And while we’re temporarily blinded, “Fooly Automasted Slef Driving” will probably kill us before that happens…

        • Routhinator@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          I’ve never seen the sensors on mine miss, 2022 vehicle though. In fact my brights sometimes turn off for any red light along the road and reflective signs.

          That said, the LED headlights without the brights on are bright enough and people constantly think the brights are on when they are not. I always think about the brights and am at the ready to manually disable them.

          The headlights themselves are too bright, and there’s no lower lumen off-white options it seems. Just full boar white. It used to be you weren’t allowed to install headlights this bright, but then billionaires paid and lobbied for rules to allow a pass if the vehicles rolled off the lot with them, and 20 years later… here we are. Not even sure the old rule still exists in any form.

    • 𝕱𝖎𝖗𝖊𝖜𝖎𝖙𝖈𝖍@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      I am physically unable to drive after sundown because those headlights fuck so hard with my light sensitivity. I can’t see anything, it feels like someone slowly stabbing your eyes with a pencil.

      Admittedly not the smartest thing to do, but I now keep a reflective umbrella in the car for when my partner is driving and one of those assholes decides to tailgate.

  • HBK@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    As an FYI, (In the United States) all modern cars will have to have some kind of screen (whether built in the mirror, on the dash, or as part of the gauge system) as all cars are required to have backup cameras as of 2018.

    Starting in 2029 all cars will be required to have automatic braking technology as well.

    We’re never going to be able to purchase new cars that are completely dumbed down ever again, but with how many lives it will save I’d say it’s worth it.

    I’m glad that there are some companies that are willing to offer cars with the bare minimum of features at least. I personally would prefer having automatic windows over crank, but if someone wants to save money more power(har har) to them!

    EDIT: weather vs whether Braking vs breaking

    • hansolo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Way over-thinking it.

      Europe and Japan 10-15 years ago all had radios with 4x6 inch no-touch displays for pre-loaded GPS with no internet connection. They switch to backup cameras when in reverse.

      America doesn’t need to invent anything here, this is old technology widely used by large parts of the rest is the world.

    • BenLeMan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Can we get another edit for braking instead of breaking, please? Surely all this fancy new-fangled tech never breaks? 😉

    • FermatsLastAccount@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      12 hours ago

      all modern cars will have to have some kind of screen (whether built in the mirror, on the dash, or as part of the gauge system)

      Starting in 2029 all cars will be required to have automatic breaking

      As an FYI, they mention both of these in the article

  • Null User Object@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    70
    ·
    13 hours ago

    There’s no radio, no Bluetooth, and no speakers of any kind beyond for those required to play basic warning chimes.

    Many will consider this a cost-cutting step too far, but the interior was designed for ease of upgrading, with easy mounting space for anything from a simple soundbar to a full sound system.

    There’s an integrated phone mount right on the dashboard, but there’s nothing stopping you from bringing something even larger. I expect the low-cost Android tablet and 3D-printing communities to have a field day coming up with in-car media streaming solutions.

    • hansolo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      8 hours ago

      This is 100% it.

      All I want is a modular car system. Everything modular. Dashboard. Body panels. Whatever. I want 3+ cars possible on one frame, and to not need anything more than basic tools to swap parts around.

      • demunted@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Gm said they’d build a sled drivetrain that they could just plop bodies on top of but that never happened sadly.

    • Raltoid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      If only that money wouldn’t be partially going into the pockets of Bezos, it would be amazing.

      And while easily replacable panels and such are a good thing. Having the mounting screws exposed like that is a horrendus idea. Because I suspect I know what much younger and very drunk people would do, based on the Mercedes hood ornaments I have in a box somewhere.

    • Opinionhaver@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      48
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Every smart feature a vehicle *doesn’t *have is a selling point for me. I want my car to be dumb as a boot.

      • Pennomi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        30
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Yep, the more software it has, the less I want it. And I’m saying that as a software engineer.

    • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      After reading the article and the website, I can’t find anything that explicitly says there is no network connection built into the vehicle.

      The instrument panel is a screen, and will be used to display the backup camera video. There is some computer capable of handling video processing and displaying the instrument graphics - so more than just low-level electronics to handle the battery and drive control. It could have built-in GPS, it could have 5G, it could still be collecting and sharing data on driving habits &etc, it could be subsidized by that on the backend. Just because those functions aren’t displayed to the end user doesn’t mean they aren’t in the system.

      • paultimate14@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Oh yes I was not commenting on any of that. Data privacy and the reliability of computer hardware and software over time are separate issues.

        I was just speaking from the basic-level user experience of operating a vehicle- touch screens are terrible. Pretty much everything you want to do in a car should have 3 requirements:

        1. Keep your eyes on the road. Controls need to be in consistent locations and have some other way of communicating what they are and what their status is non-visually. Dials, knobs, buttons that lock in-or-out, switches, levers, sliders. Anything close together needs to be differentiated- buttons with different textures, shapes, or resistance for example. This is very difficult and almost antithetical to touchscreens. The strength of the touchscreens is their flexibility- they can have deep menus that re-use a small amount of space efficiently, but the trade-off is that they need the user’s vision to work.

        2. Non-visual feedback to the user for their activation. Touch screens CAN do this with haptics and sounds. And there are physical inputs where this can be a problem, like regular buttons or knobs with uniform shapes. Levers, sliders, switches, and dials have this as inherent properties

        3. Response time. Touch screens on vehicles are usually underpowered and seem to take seconds to register an input, then apply it. If the music changes and is suddenly way too loud, it’s annoying to be subjected to that for 5 seconds while navigating the touch screen and waiting for it to work, in contrast to a regular old volume potentiometer that operates basically instantly. Really any music or audio controls can get really annoying with delay, though I’ll admit those are a luxury. Things like the lights are not.

        4. Not a requirement, but cars should be judged on whether these things FEEL good. Touch screens have improved slightly over time with better materials and haptics, but that only applies to higher-end ones and still isn’t great. Cheap physical inputs can suck too, though they are usually still better than touch screens.

      • AFaithfulNihilist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Everything you describe could be handled by a single ESP 32 module but they probably do have much more computing power than that.

        Other articles seem to indicate that it would need you to use your phone to perform updates on the onboard computer.

        I guess this doesn’t preclude the possibility of other types of embedded surveillance.

      • steal_your_face@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        Hoping it doesn’t have tracking 🤞

        If they also make a 4wd version in the future then this would basically be the first new car I’d consider buying.

        Edit: I emailed them and they said it doesn’t have any data collection at all.

        • zaperberry@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          The vehicle will absolutely collect data, but likely won’t be transmitting or collecting personal data (which is mostly done within vehicle infotainment units). It’ll be stored within the hardware which is much more preferred but I’d still consider that “data collection”.

          Most vehicles have an Event Data Recorder (EDR) which records and stores vehicle data in the event of a collision/abnormal operation above a certain threshold. They’re mandated in many countries. You can connect to these systems, some easier than others, and get vehicle data such as vehicle speed, accelerator pedal position, brake activation, changes in velocity, yaw rate, steering wheel angle, steering wheel angle rate of change, ABS/TC activation, number of ignition cycles, odometer readings, etc. Newer vehicles with enhanced safety systems (of which this vehicle doesn’t sound like it’s intended to have) can provide even more data including but not limited to proximity to a target object and camera images.

          It’s not data in the sense of personal or tracking data, but it’s still data.

      • n3m37h@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        14 hours ago

        I dont mind a secondary 8" screen for things like navigation as long as there is no control over functionality of the vehicle on said touch screen.

        My 2016 Veloster has a perfect balance