• monotremata@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Yeah, this was the part that really got me:

    “Show us a warrant,” the video shows one of the two women demanding as they attempt to get between the detainers and the detainee.

    “Do not touch me or impede me in my lawful duties,” the man in the pink shirt responds. “We are officers from Homeland Security.”

    That’s a real bully-logic move right there. How are we supposed to know that these are your lawful duties if you’re refusing to show us your warrant or even your badge? Like, if she had blocked them at this point and the issue were brought to court (and yes, it’s ironic that this is happening in a court), then I can’t imagine a jury saying “well yeah, you can’t prevent a guy from abducting someone just because he won’t give you any indication other than a pinky swear that he has the legal authority to do it.” But, of course, the obvious implication in the moment was that since he was from the “abduct people in an unmarked van with unlimited authority” branch of the government, this wasn’t going to a jury trial, and she was either getting out of the way or she was going in the van too.

    I dunno, man. It’s scary.

    • Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      20 hours ago

      So what I’m gathering here, is if you can get some friends together, you can get yourself out of court in a pinch.

      This is not behavior they want to encourage long term