• misteloct@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      Vim is hell to learn (a few weeks), but the second best time investment return I’ve made of any skill, ever (1st was learning to walk).

    • rustydrd@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Yeah, but if you’re forced to use Windows, then installing and running vim is a nightmare (unless you want gvim, but I don’t think anyone wants that).

      • Hossenfeffer@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        33 minutes ago

        Huh, I never noticed any issues when I used to use gvim (a fair few years back, mind). What’s the problem with it?

      • Hossenfeffer@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        32 minutes ago

        No, no, no, you’re thinking of iMacs which are Apple’s all in one desktop offering. But thy can definitely run MacVim.

  • quack@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    Notepad++ is a great option if you absolutely need to be on Windows. I started using it at work because all of my colleagues were on it, now I install it on any box I have running Windows while I set them up.

    • JargonWagon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 hours ago

      The plugins are great on Notepad++ too! I use it for work, JSON Viewer makes raw jsons much easier to parse through. Compare is really nice too to compare different files and spot their differences.

  • BaroqueBobby@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Feeling the same, and currently in process of dumbing down my tech and decoupling from major tech platforms. They really got us by the balls.

    Long live open source!

    • dubyakay@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Notepad++ does way more out of the box. I’m saying this as someone who has used npp for over a decade and been using Kate since last September since indefinitely switching to Linux.

    • rustydrd@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      I think in general you can also just expect that any OS, techy or not, ships with a basic, lightweight text editor. The fact that Windows seems to want to change that is an anti-feature for the entire OS.

        • KubeRoot@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Not if you don’t use windows, or if you want a more modern looking and less busy interface, or integration with what I consider the best git GUI. I used to use N++ long ago, but after trying ST I realized it just feels clunky.

        • ComfortableRaspberry@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          13 hours ago

          My entire work brain is in there. Hundreds of tabs none of them were ever saved. I was recently looking for something and found notes I took 2 years ago. I love it but I also get why a lot of people don’t.

        • fossilesque@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 hours ago

          Personal preference. :) I use it bare bones but like having the option to extend when needed.

      • BackgrndNoize@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Yeah I have that as well, and I’m surprised how fast and light weight it feels compared to something like VS code

  • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    This is a pretty random Notepad story, but: in 1999 I was doing web development for Internet Explorer 6 (yes, I know) using Classic ASP and Visual Basic (5 or 6? I can’t be bothered to look shit like that up). Probably my most important debugging tool was the “View Source” menu option in IE6, which would bring up the raw HTML of whatever page I was working on in Notepad. One day the “View Source” option just stopped working, completely. Clicking that menu wouldn’t do anything at all; I tried everything I could think of but just couldn’t fix the problem. For six months I was basically coding blind - I had no way of directly seeing the HTML my code was producing.

    Somehow I managed to still get my work done. Then one day I stumbled across an obscure forum post that said “View Source” in IE6 would not work if you had a shortcut to Notepad on your Desktop. I of course had a shortcut to Notepad on my Desktop since I kept everything on my desktop (yes, I know). I renamed my shortcut to “NotepadX” and suddenly “View Source” in IE6 started working again. Possibly the happiest day of my programming life. I played around with it and found that it didn’t have to actually be a shortcut to Notepad - it could be a shortcut to any program or file, but if it happened to be named “Notepad” it would block View Source from working.

    I would give anything to find out where this particular bug came from. It’s really bothered the shit out of me for the past 26 years. I don’t see how it could ever happen accidentally, so I have to assume that some MS programmer somewhere really hated people with shortcuts to commonly-used programs on their Desktop and decided to punish them.

    • H4CK3RN4M3D4N63R570RM@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I love that story. Thanks for sharing. What a crazy bug. Maybe IE6 was integrating with windows in some weird way? I almost want to fire up a VM and see if I can replicate it. Think you can remember which version of windows it was?

      • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 minutes ago

        IE was literally embedded into the OS. There’s no surprise there were bugs like that.

    • milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Wow! Thank you for sharing; what an weird bug! Perhaps some ancient code to make use of notepad for view source if available, then the available function got changed, for other reasons, to if on desktop, then a different version of notepad broke the chain of borked code?

      • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Well, IE6 did open Notepad to show source by default, but it makes no sense why a shortcut to Notepad just existing on the Desktop would prevent that. Especially when it didn’t even have to be a real shortcut to Notepad.

        • postmateDumbass@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Probably tried to execute Notepad.lnk, because Desktop came before /system in the path, and however they were calling it did not resolve the link before executing - and that meant a hang, silent error, or no op

  • JeremyHuntQW12@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Its not really AI its just a string manipulation program, that, rather pointlessly, summarises paragraphs. The sort of thing you see done in BASIC in old program listing books.

  • grayautumnday@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Good luck. As of this writing, I have UNINSTALLED copilot from Windows 11 Pro FOURTEEN TIMES in the past 3 weeks. I continually turn off its access to running in the background and terminate and its services in task manager multiple times a day. I’ve blocked the app in my non-MS antimalware suite. I have uac enabled to block unauthorized apps. I have disabled it in my startup apps repeatedly, to no avail .

    I have disabled Edge browser everywhere possible, but Edge still manages to open itself up and REOPEN COPILOT even though I’ve disabled Edge multiple times and it is literally not the default app for even a single file type.

    It’s no longer POSSIBLE to install a single Office app, or uninstall single office apps. I do not need and do not want to bloat a ton of my SSD boot drive with Access and Designer and Publisher. The windows store standalone version of Outlook cannot load or save .pst backups.

    MS has returned to even worse than its evil Borg ways. But now it’s one of several threats to the continued existence of privacy anywhere for anyone.

    Down with #enshittification #deshittify the #internet. Up with #CryptPad #Nextcloud #OnlyOffice (and to a lesser extent the commercial version #CollaberaOffice). Up with #StandardNotes and #ProtonMail, #ProtonCalendar, #ProtonDrive, #ProtonVPN, and #ProtonPass. Sad RIP to any and all security patches for #RIPLibreOffice (libre users - switch to security-patch-maintained software asap!)

    Up with companies based in countries with strong privacy protections, that provide zero-knowledge services, and that do zero or minimal logging and discard logs swiftly (yay for thegood.cloud)!

  • Poop@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I mourn Notepad as well, but Notepad++ is great and it hasn’t smeared shit on itself yet.

  • Rose@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Notepad had one job. Operate on a damn text file. Operate on the damn text files I choose.

    I knew it was going down the drain when I reopened Notepad and it opened the files that were previously open. No. Don’t do that. That’s overly helpful. You were only supposed to operate on the damn files I chose. These files I’m about to work with aren’t necessarily the files I previously worked on. If I want this functionality I might as well open it in vscode.

    I’m, like, screw it, might as well keep Emacs running if I need random temporary text editing.

    • SavageCreation@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      17 hours ago

      I hate it when my technology tries to be smart. Be predictable, you piece of junk. I dont need my laptop to sleep when I shut the lid because all that foes is stop it from shutting down. And opening it doesnt need to turn it on ffs. I blame company policy.

      I miss when things were simple, predictable, and you could simply work around them.

    • dogs0n@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Personally I find that feature (including tabs in general) very helpful and is something i’d expect from a text editor in the 20th century.

      Just my opinion. To each their own, but just wanted to share that it might also be many others’ opinion too.

      • wabasso@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I think I’d be able to agree with you if new notepad didn’t take a noticeable time to load. It used to be the 2nd fastest thing I could launch, after the Run dialog itself.

      • antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Gotta agree here with you. Yeah theoretically maybe someone really just needs a text editor with absolutely no additional convenient features (maybe the older versions of Notepad allowing different fonts and word wrap was too much for someone as well?). But this is such an objective improvement in 95% of usecases it’s kind of ridiculous to complain about it.

      • oo1@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Meh, sounds like a worse version of notepad++, which has been very popular and reliable since the early 21st century.

        If they make notepad more bloated than notepad++ then I’d use it even less.

        But each to their own.

        • JustARegularNerd@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          19 hours ago

          See I’d use Notepad++ if I was coding or doing any kind of actual file editing.

          However, when I’m at work and need to take a phone call, the tabs in Notepad and the auto saving are literally game changing for me.

          That being said I haven’t bothered with the AI stuff in it at all, and it feels as usual, Microsoft doesn’t stop when they have a Good Thing already, they keep pushing it beyond that point for their interests. And now we’re left with not a basic editor but a personal assistant.

          Long live Linux and freedom of choice.

          • SavageCreation@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            17 hours ago

            But that is literally what I use notepad++ for: tabs, keeping unsaved files (good for temporary things like reminders) and also because I swear it opens faster than notepad.

      • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        15 hours ago

        In the 20th century I’d expect something that can open, edit and save plaintext files. But we’re 1/4th of the way into the 21st century.

        I find I have two uses for a plaintext editor: plaintext, and computer script. I don’t like using rich text editors like Word for writing notes and such because the formatting options just get in the way; plaintext lets me “just write.” And for this, there’s very little automation that will be helpful.

        In the Linux ecosystem, plaintext editors are all trying so hard to be IDEs. They’ll close parentheses or quotes or whatever for you, and if you’re doing something like 15" to mean fifteen inches you’ll get two, you’ll hit backspace and it’ll take both away…it doesn’t help.

        If I’m programming anything of any size I’m going to open an IDE, probably because I’m working within some ecosystem. If I’m writing a couple lines of Bash I’ll probably use Vim. So I’d rather tune my plaintext editor to write actual .txt files, as prose.

          • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            12 hours ago

            That would fall under “computer script.”

            I am either:

            • Writing in plain human English, in which case I need a PLAIN TEXT editor. Maybe I want spell check and stuff like that in it.
            • Writing computer code, for which I’ll use a code editor or IDE. Maybe I want syntax highlighting and bracket closing and auto indent here.
      • Lv_InSaNe_vL@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        18 hours ago

        I like how the tabs save when I close notepad. Its super helpful when I just need to jot down some quick notes or a serial number or something.

        And I’m really dumb so I often close my notepad window before I’m done and this feature has saved me numerous times.

        I don’t have copilot in my notepad tho. Which is good.

        • MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          17 hours ago

          The best part is that it even retains unsaved documents (and unsaved changes in existing ones), which makes it very feasible to use Notepad as sort of an extended clipboard. Surprisingly good thinking for Microsoft.

    • MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      FYI, you can turn this feature off. Click on the gear icon, scroll all the way down, there’s a new section called “AI features”, which has a toggle switch to disable Copilot. Once you flip it to off, Notepad looks and behaves precisely as it did in the past.

      EDIT: also, you need to be logged into a Microsoft account and have an active Copilot Plus subscription for any of the AI features to even work. If you try to use them without a subscription, you just get prompted to sign up for one.

  • clashorcrashman@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I’m glad I left Windows again when I did (about 2 years ago). There’s no AI bullshit in vim or mousepad. That said, vim is available on windows, so a full switch isn’t necessary if you’re not all about that Linux life.

  • oni ᓚᘏᗢ@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    106
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    AI sure killed the motto KISS. Copilot for notepad is literally using a nuclear reactor to light a single bulb.

      • BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        17 hours ago

        They’re not temporary any more, they keep coming back, I keep forgetting and then my PC reboots and I need to make a quick note and have to wait for 50 zombie text files to rise from the dead.

          • mhague@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            18
            ·
            edit-2
            23 hours ago

            I wonder, why is ‘literally’ so special?

            Someone steps out into unexpectedly cold weather and says, “It’s freezing out here.” But it’s not below freezing.

            Someone that hasn’t eaten all day takes a bite and says, “I was starving, this is the best burger I’ve ever tasted!” They weren’t really starving, and they probably didn’t just rank every burger they’ve eaten.

            We exaggerate and/or use words incorrectly for the effect so often, people are constantly using words “incorrectly” but then they say, “I’m literally dead right now.” and dictionaries change their definitions and people point out semantics. It’s like literally is figuratively magic.

            • FrChazzz@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              15
              ·
              23 hours ago

              It’s almost like language is radically democratic and words only mean what we largely agree they mean, with fluctuating cases based on particular contexts.

            • theblips@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              22 hours ago

              Yeah, somehow “literally” is the only word in a figure of speech that cannot be part of the figure at all! They are so smart for pointing that out

            • Lumidaub@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              20 hours ago

              “Freezing” is an exaggeration of “cold”, just like “starving” is an exaggeration of “hungry”. It’s “a lot of X”.

              “Literally” is not an exaggeration, it’s the opposite of “figuratively”. It’s “-X”.

              Those are two entirely different things. But of course inflammable means flammable.

              • petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                18 hours ago

                Incorrect.

                Freezing
                “Freezing is a phase transition in which a liquid turns into a solid when its temperature is lowered below its freezing point.”

                Starvation
                “Starvation is a severe deficiency in caloric energy intake, below the level needed to maintain an organism’s life.”

                You are literally wrong, and I will accept a 1-page apology written in MLA format before the end of this week.

                • Lumidaub@feddit.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  17 hours ago

                  I honestly do not see the contradiction. “Very cold” -> liquid turns to solid. “Very hungry” -> severe deficiency.

            • oo1@lemmings.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              17 hours ago

              Table can mean “to discuss a topic at a meeting” (British English) or “to postpone discussion of a topic” (American English). Canadian English uses both meanings of the word

              Canada . . . seriously? I can’t sanction that type of behaviour.

              • porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                12 hours ago

                That’s the problem with being influenced by both British and American English. We have both senses in New Zealand English too, although I think the US one is slowly winning out and the British one might one day fall out of use.

            • Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              24 hours ago

              The correct definition is the opposite of figuratively. This has been an ongoing linguistic war for nearly a century, and your WRONG thoughts on how it should be used only serve to further the enemies cause.

              • porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                24 hours ago

                This has been an ongoing linguistic war for nearly a century

                So after over a century of people using it that way some other people got a stick up their butt about it, cool. Doesn’t make it wrong.

                • oo1@lemmings.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  ·
                  17 hours ago

                  People who get het up about “literally” are fabulous.

                  If Dickens, Twain and Joyce can use it as an intensifier, then that’s awesome enough for me.

                  Of course literally is often overused figuratively, flogged like a dead metaphorse; but used literally, literally is often literally redundant anyway.

                  I think it’s got a third use now though, which is even more fun, using it to troll languague purists who think language drives communication rather than the other way round. That might well have motivated Mark Twain too.

      • theblips@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        22 hours ago

        The use of “literally” is part of the figure of speech you’re pedantically referring to. Saying “figuratively” would be redundant, as everyone knows Copilot is not a nuclear reactor, and also declaring that you are using a figure of speech “weakens” it (like /s for sarcasm). By saying “literally” they are saying “wow, this fits so well that this isn’t even a metaphor anymore”.
        If you want to correct everyone for saying literally instead of figuratively, correct every teenager saying “I’m actually dying rn 😂” with “ackshually you’re not ACTUALLY dying, as I can see you are still alive typing tips fedora

        • Septimaeus@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Oh. I thought “literally” was just referring to the fact that many of those data centers pull from nuclear grids.

    • TORFdot0@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      22 hours ago

      The new moto is “keep giving me money stupid”

      How wasting billions on AI accomplishes that goal, I don’t know but I’m sticking with FOSS apps and platforms just to be safe

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      The first nuclear reactor was used to light a single bulb. Presumably it was either an incredibly inefficient bulb or an incredibly inefficient reactor.

      Anyway this is all just an extension of everything having an app.

      • oni ᓚᘏᗢ@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Using an actual nuclear reactor to light a single bulb is literally using a- I’m kidding. I leave lemmy for a couple hours, come back and see a total armageddon, all because there are picky people about the use of words.

  • comfy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Installing cross-platform programs like that is a great way to prepare for a move over to penguin town, and check for any blockers keeping you from making the leap.