Can’t run Windows 11? Don’t want to? There are surprisingly legal options

    • Psythik@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I would but my DJ gear is over a decade old and none of it is compatible with Linux. It won’t even run on a modern CPU without crashing Serato, so I use an old laptop with a 4th gen i5 running LTSC to power my turntables and mixer; it all runs smooth as butter on period-correct hardware.

      Eventually I will get new gear and try to get it working in Linux, but I don’t have thousands to drop right now on updated hardware, so I make do with what I have.

      • Mooseford@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Have you tried something like Mixx and a MIDI controller of some sort? I really don’t know all that much about the minutiae of DJing, but a friend used to DJ parties a lot with just his laptop and Mixx and that was like 20 years ago or somesuch.

        • Psythik@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Mixxx is alright but I prefer the robustness and simplicity of Serato. And my turntables technically are MIDI controllers. Fully digital and no needle or DVS interface needed. But spins and behaves just like real vinyl. I don’t like controllers with static jogwheels, which limits my selection when it comes to MIDI hardware. I’ve considered real turntables but they are out of my budget. And they can be finicky when using them with DJ software.

          • Mooseford@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 hour ago

            Ah, I can understand that. Interface can make or break it for sure. I just play my guitars straight into a tube amp 99% though I use a piece of software to convert the guitar signal into MIDI for playing synths the other 1% of the time, so DJ equipment and workflow are outside my area of expertise. Just recall my friend doing DJ stuff and no one ever questioned the setup and everyone seemed to have a good time :)

        • Psythik@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          23
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Because I don’t want to run hardware that needs to operate in realtime over a USB 2.0 connection through a VM. I have digital turntables with high-resolution platters. These are precision instruments that require the absolute lowest DPC latency obtainable; I need to eliminate as much overhead as I can, and have my equipment running as close to the bare metal as I can get from a modern OS.

            • Psythik@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 hours ago

              Open format, so literally anything and everything. I go entirely by audience reaction when deciding what to play. But mostly I like happy songs with a party vibe.

                  • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    3 hours ago

                    Ooooo yes I would love that. Bookmarked for next time I work. I skipped around and as a lover of EDM, trance, HHC, Dn’B, and all stuff like that, I think what you okay is right up my alley.

          • chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            1 day ago

            Not sure if you’re using a desktop or laptop (unclear if you’re doing DJ stuff for mixing privately or gigging on the road), but hardware passthrough through something like SR-IOV would make latency a non-issue.

            However, I get what you’re saying. I was more thinking of the “I want to run this on a legacy operating system for as long as I can” aspect of things. Eliminating the concern of the hardware no longer supporting a more modern operating system was what I was trying to get at. Sorry if that didn’t come through.

        • PlutoniumAcid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          24 hours ago

          What would be the point? That’s just staying on Windows, with extra steps and lower performance.

          • bss03@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 hours ago

            The VM protects somewhat from network attacks and spread. But, I do imagine most vulnerabilities of Win10 would still be exploitable, and you would be sacrificing some performance, yes.

          • chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            18 hours ago

            They mention their equipment is legacy and only supports Windows 10. An Airgapped VM of Windows 10 is a good option to continue supporting legacy hardware.

    • ohshit604@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      My company has decided to dedicate me and another coworker to go computer-2-computer and check if they have TPM 2.0 support.

      I’m doing my best to push a Linux switch in our workplace!

      • Wispy2891@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 day ago

        It’s not just tpm 2.0 support, but simply Intel 8th gen or higher or Ryzen

        Intel 6th gen CPUs could totally support tpm 2.0 but they decided to cut them off because $$$

        There is no real technical reason, management wanted the line to go up so they had meetings and meetings with the engineering teams in order to find a somewhat reasonable excuse to send to the landfill millions and millions of perfectly usable computers