there isn’t a single shred of evidence to support it.
Well, to be fair, what would such evidence look like? Would you like to see secret documents (conveniently found in a rich banker’s living room) that detail that single-family homes get easier credit benefits so that more people buy them? I’m afraid that kind of proof will be difficult to get hold of, if the banks or whoever might be behind it don’t show it to us out of their own free will.
Who would look for such evidence? Who can pay for a search after that evidence? The banks won’t investigate themselves and find that they manipulate people.
As such, it is directly natural that there is no proof. That doesn’t automatically make it wrong though, just without proof. The question is: is it likely? is it perceivable? is it consistent?
Well, to be fair, what would such evidence look like? Would you like to see secret documents (conveniently found in a rich banker’s living room) that detail that single-family homes get easier credit benefits so that more people buy them? I’m afraid that kind of proof will be difficult to get hold of, if the banks or whoever might be behind it don’t show it to us out of their own free will.
Who would look for such evidence? Who can pay for a search after that evidence? The banks won’t investigate themselves and find that they manipulate people.
As such, it is directly natural that there is no proof. That doesn’t automatically make it wrong though, just without proof. The question is: is it likely? is it perceivable? is it consistent?