Europe’s leaders are scrambling. Their hastily convened security summit in Paris on Monday is proof of that.

They are still reeling from not being invited by the US to talks with Russia over the future of Ukraine. US President Donald Trump said on Sunday he could be meeting Russian President Vladimir Putin “very soon”.

Can Europe, under pressure, put political differences and domestic economic concerns aside, and come up with a united front on security spending and on Ukraine’s future, including potentially sending troops there - to force themselves a spot at the negotiating table?

They are going to try.

MBFC
Archive

    • Eril@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      But it’s on the other side of Ukraine and even if he would take over completely there, I’m pretty sure Ukraine would go into guerilla mode not exactly helping an invasion of Moldova. But it’s russia after all, so better not reply on logic alone🙈

    • einkorn@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      Armenia might also be an option if he wants to be best buds with Azerbaijan again.

            • einkorn@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 days ago

              Oh, I misinterpreted your comment then.

              It’s still possible to argue that it’s “not a big deal”, though. Russia has had a constant military presence in the breakaway region of Transnistria for decades, so technically not much would change.

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                6 days ago

                I didn’t say it was not a big deal. I said him taking over Armenia is not a big threat to Europe. A further incursion into Europe via Moldova is a big threat. Especially to Romania. Transnistria is between Moldova and Ukraine. That has been a threat since Russia invaded Ukraine. Invading Moldova and moving that border to Romania would make things an even bigger threat. I’m not sure why I need to explain this in such detail.

                • einkorn@feddit.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  6 days ago

                  In which sense would it be a bigger threat than before?

                  Unlike Kaliningrad Moldova is landlocked so if Russia manages to take it, the country is not suitable as a staging point for serious military operations, because material can only reach it via air Though given their current international standing I am not sure if reinforcement that way even is a possibility at the moment or in the near future as Romania would likely close their airspace to Russia and Ukraine … is Ukraine.

                  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    6 days ago

                    If you don’t understand what being able to have a military on the border of Romania, where it is not now, is a bigger threat to Europe than the way things are now, I really do not know how to explain it to you. Maybe play a game of Risk sometime? Even if it doesn’t explain things to you, it’s a fun board game.