I don’t like smartphones. I use a dumbphone.

But this is a wonderful initiative.

  • FourWaveforms@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    They say it’s supported until 2031.

    What will a 5G phone with at most 8GB RAM have to offer in 2031?

    • desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      assuming it supports 5g calling and 5g lasts as long as 3g did it will still function for calls, MMS, SMS, and email at a minimum (assuming encryption doesn’t change too much)

  • Destide@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    I’ve owned the 4, for a couple of years. Was really excited to get one.

    Parts have been unavailable for a long time when I needed them. The battery is pretty dead after 2 years meanwhile my pixel which is about 5 years old still going strong. The os is the buggiest experience I’ve ever had, sluggish, going from portrait the landscape kills UI formatting if it switches to power save it’ll skip a video. Boot loops constantly.

    Never again I’m afraid it’s neat I could fix things with it so quickly but they fail hard past that.

    Example navigation buttons have just covered the voyager ui

    • Leeuk@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Thanks for sharing your experience. I believe the F6 is likely expected by autumn and was considering this as my next. I often wondered about parts as time goes by, as I suspected the company wouldn’t want a huge inventory of spares and the costs involved. If I do get one, I’ll likely buy a spare screen at the least.

      The UI stuff is disappointing, however maybe not a deal breaker as I’m trying to reduce my usage. Perhaps a buggy smartphone could be a decent dumbphone alternative.

    • Tonuka@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Wow. I got the 4 at launch and honestly never had any problems except calls get fucked up more frequently recently. Didn’t know they stopped selling parts, what’s the point?

      • Destide@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        They didn’t stop selling parts they were just unavailable which when you need them as you say defeats the point.

  • rmuk@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    10 hours ago

    The hardware is good and I like the idea in principle but Fairphone’s support and software QA is dreadful and you need to hope you never need the former because of problems with the latter. My FP5 was bricked by an update they pushed out and after six weeks of trying to get a solution from their support (four weeks of which they didn’t respond at all) I ended up claiming on insurance and buying a Pixel. According to the forums this problem is far from unique to me.

    • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I’ve been running FP4 for about 2 years now. the software bug fix cycle leaves something to be desired.

      for example, the first 16 months of my ownership had every single phone call screaming at me. I mean, the volume was loud enough it was quieter than the speaker phone.

      the did eventually fix that bug, but not two months later there’s a bug that breaks my running processes button(square at the bottom). as of right now there’s no fix other than using the OEM shitty launcher. so, 5-10 times a day I have to go to settings > apps > default apps > launcher > bliss launcher > running apps > settings > launchers > my launcher > close what I just had to use > go back to what I was just doing.

      I enjoy the phone, don’t get me wrong. I just wish they performed better software testing on their own hardware.

      I got the phone for the ethics, reparability, and privacy. I’ll never go back.

    • Reygle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 hours ago

      As an owner of an old pine phone, I can confidently say avoid for now. Not remotely ready or reliable enough.

  • bitwolf@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Please get through the FCC and open sales in the USA before Fairphone 6 is made.

    I really don’t want to buy another unrepairable phone.

    • excral@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Then an ethically and sustainably built smart phone isn’t for you, because that won’t be possible at that price point. But that isn’t an issue as there is a sustainable option at that price point: buying second hand.

  • Sizing2673@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I really want this to come to the US as well…

    Is this phone also more secure?

    The problem we are running into right now is Apple and Google are colluding with the US government over fascism and they are supporting their Nazi regime

    They have all the power and they can change all of these services overnight, they can track you and everything and you will have no idea and no way to get rid of it

    We really need an open replacement. Phones are now used for everything

    • ArchRecord@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Is this phone also more secure?

      Probably not.

      Apple & Google have spent considerable amounts of time building out hardware security infrastructure for their products that I find it extremely unlikely Fairphone would have been able to match.

      For example, the popular alternative Android OS GrapheneOS only supports Google Pixels, because: (Emphasis added by me)

      “There are currently no other devices meeting even the most basic security requirements while running an alternate OS. GrapheneOS is very interested in supporting a non-Pixel brand, but the vast majority of Android OEMs do not take security seriously. Samsung takes security almost as seriously as Google, but they deliberately cripple their devices when unlock them to install another OS and don’t allow an alternate OS to use important security features. If Samsung permitted GrapheneOS to support their devices properly, many of their phones would be the closest to meeting our requirements. They’re currently missing the very important hardware memory tagging feature, but only because it’s such a new feature”

      If even Samsung, the only other phone brand on the market they consider close to meeting their standards, doesn’t support every modern hardware security feature, and deliberately cripples their security for alternate OS’s, as a multi billion dollar company, I doubt Fairphone has custom-built hardware security mechanisms for their phones to the degree that Google has.

    • SL3wvmnas@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I used a Fairphone 4 with /e/ and it was good. Not great, but useable. I expect the hardware bugs I ran into (using the camera only worked like 20 times before the phone needed a restart, Bluetooth randomly not working) to be ironed out by now. Currently on an old Samsung and it is more solid, but I also liked the environmentalism with the fairphone. Anyone with a Fairphone 5 and something like a glucose sensor thats in constant use?

  • ravelin@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Aaaand it’s impossible to buy in the US. Even if USians want to do the right thing, we’re not permitted.

  • roawn@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    20 hours ago

    I’m using this phone right now and I love it. it feels solid. Im using a degoogled ROM and it just works, there seems to be a lot of people pressing for graphene os specifically and discrediting the phone for what it is. its so easy to take apart and cheaply repair its great. it’s perfect for folk who want a decent smartphone that you dont have to worry about being thrown around. sure it’s not perfect but it is still a very great photo

      • Piece_Maker@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        18 hours ago

        I use CalyxOS on mine. It has microG all working by default so if you need that sort of thing it’s probably the easiest way to get it up and running

        • MangoCats@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Yeah, that plus labor is 80% of what I typically pay for a whole brand new phone… I know why it is this way, but it really is this way and that makes it very hard for low volume players to enter the market.

          • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 hours ago

            Smartphones of this price would be low quality, impossible to self epair, and very likely made with very poor social and environmental conditions. It’s the opposite of what Fairphone does, so the comparison is not possible.

  • chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    Really wish Fairphone would come to the US. I’d spend the money on it, but they only half-ass sold the last gen phone here on the US.

    I don’t even understand why. They support most 4G and every mid and low band 5G in America. Even if I could just import it, I’d be happy.

    • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      AT&T has a whitelist system, they check IMEIs often and if your device is not approved, cell service stops working.

      For Verizon, you have to call customer service to do a manual override.

      Only T-Mobile allows any phone to work without explicit approval.

      Probably some reason like they don’t want people complaining the service is bad because they use a “no-name brand” phone, so they just cut you off and blame your phpne because it’s easier for corporate. (Yay, capitalism! 🫠 /s)

      I heard that Australia now has a Nationwide whitelist system that even block unapproved phones from calling the emergency number.

      Technology is really getting enshittified. 😓

      • chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Unfortunately Telecomms in Australia seem to have a pissing contest on who can screw consumers more, America or Aussie companies.

      • chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I appreciate it, but I just got a new phone because I needed a new one recently. I wish it could have been something like a Fairphone, but thems the breaks.

  • sonosonic@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 hours ago

    I’ve had this phone for over a year with Murena e/OS/! 90hz refresh rate is so nice

  • vga@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I wish they could implement the parts of the Pixel phones that allow GrapheneOS to be used.

    • Tangent5280@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      24 hours ago

      What parts are these? I’ve always wondered what this was about, why the pixel was the only phone that could support GrapheneOS

      • neon_nova@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        24 hours ago

        The last I looked was that the Pixel was the only phone that allowed you to load a custom rom and relock the bootloader. Other phones kept the bootloader unlocked once it was modded.

        So, graphene could be put on those phones if the devs wanted to do it, but it would be less secure since the bootloader would remain unlocked.

        Also, supporting a small line a phones is probably infinitely easier than a range, of devices, but it would be nice to have another option. Especially now that the Fairphone pice is reasonable.

        • baduhai@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          16 hours ago

          The last I looked was that the Pixel was the only phone that allowed you to load a custom rom and relock the bootloader. Other phones kept the bootloader unlocked once it was modded.

          That is not the case. SHIFTmq, Motorola and Fairphone allow the bootloader to be relocked with a custom rom. There are many requirements the Fairphone lacks for GrapheneOS, but relocking the bootloader is not one of them.

        • Prism@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          23 hours ago

          The Fairphone can be locked after flashing a custom rom. /e/-OS is officially supported. You can even buy it from them with /e/ preinstalled. iode-OS also works. I don’t know about Graphene OS, but tbh, I don’t see the benefit of Graphene OS for the average user. /e/ has built in privacy features, is google-free and runs MicroG as alternative to Google Play Services. Most apps run fine. You can even use your apps that you purchased from the PlayStore.

          I’ve been using Fairphone 5 with /e/-OS for over a year and love it.

          • Luffy@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            16
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            23 hours ago

            /e/ has built in privacy features

            /e/ uses a for profit 3rd party for unencrypted backups. That alone should be a big red flag.

            is google-free and runs MicroG

            So it runs google. MicroG just limits what data is sent to google.

            You can even use your apps that you purchased from the PlayStore.

            You can do the same with aurora store. That’s available on just about every phone.

            • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              20 hours ago

              You can do the same with aurora store. That’s available on just about every phone.

              not if the app attempts to verify its license through the play store. you need microg for that, or patch it

            • Prism@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              18 hours ago

              It a perfectly usable Android for the average user. Everything works out of the boy. If it is not for you, fine. Buy a Pixel.

              • Luffy@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                16 hours ago

                for the average user.

                So we are talking about an average user, who

                • fully understands the appeal of a degoogled Phone
                • Willingly spends extra money for a fairphone
                • is able to migrate away from google services to /e/'s services
                • Is willing and able to troubleshoot any problems that MicroG has
                • is willing to fix not working banking apps
                • but somehow can’t use a simple web installer from Calyx

                Tell me, is this average user in the room with us right now?

                Everything works out of the boy.

                So does (and does not) with Calix or Graphene

                Buy a Pixel.

                I think you don’t get what I’m talking about.

                -It takes a base level of understanding why you would buy a Fairphone (or any degoogled phone)

                • it takes a base level of understanding phones to be able to use a degoogled one
                • If you already have that knowledge, you might as well just take an extra 5 minutes and use the web installer for calyx since it is literally the same AND has less vendor lockin than /e/

                Edit: You want an average user friendly ROM? Just use Lineage for gods sake.

                • sudneo@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 hours ago

                  In 4 years I have never (and will never) used any service from /e/. There is no vendor lock whatsoever. That’s fully optional.

                  Points 3, 4 and 5 in your list are moot IMHO.

                  Also

                  It takes a base level of understanding why you would buy a Fairphone

                  It doesn’t really. “Phone is repairable and X can help me”, “they pay the makers fair wages” are not really complex value propositions that require some (technical) understanding.

                  The point of /e/ and similar distributions is that you can buy a phone with it (average user will never reflash) and just have a phone that doesn’t use Google (it does, for the amount that doesn’t require you to do extra technical stuff and have a sane user experience at the same time).

                  That said, calyx seems a great alternative and so are iode. I think the advantages of one over the other (for my brief search) are quite small.

            • joel_feila@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              21 hours ago

              Well even graphene os still runs a version of Android. So there is still some goggle code in that. But ripping oit google play, amd various goggle services means goggle doesn’t track you with those. Yeah if you still ise gmail and log into toutube every day they will.

              • Luffy@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                ·
                20 hours ago

                there is still some goggle code in that.

                But that code is open source, and it has been verified that it dosent track you.

          • vga@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            edit-2
            21 hours ago

            e-OS is said to have the worst security of pretty much all Android distributions. Dunno if this is a fact, but apparently the upgrade schedules are not great.

    • Luffy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      I mean, you could use CalyxOS

      It dosent have such things as 2 factor pin auth for fingerprint, but its the closest to Graphene

      • jabjoe@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Not quite the same. The big thing with GrapheneOS is it can run the actual Google services, but sandboxed. Organic Maps is better than Google Maps in everyway, but it’s routes are so much worse because it has no traffic into to go on. It’s an anticompetitive network effect, but it’s hard to fight without law makers.

  • ZeroOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    20 hours ago

    Bring back the headphone jack & we’ll be happy.

    Next up, make the phone compatible with Linux OSs

    • Lady Butterfly @lazysoci.al
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      We can but hope. I have a dongle that plugs into my charging point to make it a headphone jack, but it’s not the same

      • Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        24 hours ago

        I recently went through that dongle buying experience. Having to get the correct DAC and amplifier chipset so the sound won’t be too low is annoying. For the record I ended up going with one that has the CX31993 DAC and the MAX97220 amplifier, it doesn’t have a real name so I’ll just give a link: https://aliexpress.com/item/1005008755907868.html. It is a bit louder than my first impulsive buy, but I haven’t tested the microphone yet.

    • endeavor@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      22 hours ago

      No thanks, i’ve broken every single one. A dap with bluetooth receiver works better.

      • dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        22 hours ago

        What do you do to break them?

        In my forties and never broken a headphone jack, headphones, cable, or in fact anything like that. I tend to take care of my stuff and not treat it in such a way as I’m going to break it.

        • endeavor@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          21 hours ago

          Put it in my jeans pocket and move about my day as usual. Cycling broke them in a year, reliably.