Hi, I just want to share / get some opinion.

I started using Linux 2 years back. I was dual booting back then and after a year switched to Linux completely.

I started out using Ubuntu, hated it, installed Manjaro after a week and when pacmac broke the thing within 2 months, I watched a bunch of YouTube videos, read the arch wiki and installed arch. Things were going great except for some Nvidia issues (I am using an Optimus laptop) but utt was running smoothly. Then decided that I want to build a game engine and the nvidia issues were significant. So I read somewhere that Fedora has great nvidia support and I installed it and everything worked. I installed Fedora 39, and it worked. When Fedora 40 came, I upgraded no issues, Fedora 41 came, no issues.

But just a few days back when I had vacation, I decided my system was getting bloated and I didn’t manually want to uninstall apps, I decided let’s format it. But I thought… Arch might take up less space on my disk(1 have a 512gb nvme, and t 2tb hdd, but I like to put things like games and projects I am working on, on the nvme). So I installed arch and loving the experience. I installed Nvidia-open drm drivers and it just works.

TLDR: Is it normal to distro hop after being using a distro perfectly for so long?

PS: I used archinstall because I didn’t want through the lengthy process again. And archinstall works great.

    • IsoSpandy@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      I had tried opensuse tumbleweed and absolutely loved the way it did things, my perfect balance between fedora and arch, but there were Teo problems that I couldn’t get over.

      1. Zypper is slow.
      2. I couldn’t get it to do parallel downloads packages.

      But it’s a great distro nonetheless.

      Also it has a similar problem with fedora that arch doesn’t. VIDEO CODECS. I don’t understand how the USA messes with my ability to play a video and I am seriously annoyed by it.

    • PrefersAwkward@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      If distro hopping happens more than once a week, please stop hopping immediately and dial 911 as this is the sign of a very rare and serious symptom

      plays more upbeat music

  • MNByChoice@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Yes, normal. It is good for you and it is good for Linux.

    Distros try different things, and it is good to be exposed to many of those. It helps to discover the most functional ideas and cross pollinate.

    Wait until you try non-linux FOSS OSes…

    Easier to distro hope if your data is safe elsewhere.

    • azimir@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I had a three year bender with OpenBSD back in 2001-2003 or so. I even started building my own kernels and doing a tiny bit of hacking on the code. There’s all kinds of interesting tools and systems out there if you start exploring.

      • MNByChoice@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Nice!

        I am currently setting up a FreeBSD ZFS file server. Software installs are so fast I thought they failed. (OS installer needs quality of life improvemens.)

  • milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’ve also hopped distros on a scale of several years at a time. Loved Arch before I was living on an awful internet connection; did Ubuntu until they messed with snaps; loved Tumbleweed for a few years, but the volume of updates was getting a bit much; nearly learnt Nix but a trial run of Home Manager went up in flames, then I realised multiple layered package versions wasn’t worth the ‘stability’; now Mint’s been doing the job nicely, but I’m tempted to try KDE’s new distro someday.

  • chaoticnumber@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I did something very similar, spent about a year on fedora … 33? then discovered “my preferred distro” and never looked back.

    Thing is that everyone finds their place with a distro and settles for as long as it suits their needs. Then, you might move on, you might not. Its just an OS, a means to an end. Use what you need, then use something else, no need to go to the doctor for hopping headaches :)

    • milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      I recommend distrohopping to check out Vista and iOS. It’s easier to get started with if you dual boot them on your W11 netbook.

  • PushButton@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    I distro hopped last year. Proud user of Debian for 15+ years, switched for Void.

    Amazing little distro, simple just how I like it.

  • arality@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Variety is the spice of life. I’ve used Slackware, Arch, Gentoo, Fedora, Nix, been on Debian the last few years. Been looking at setting up my own UBlue image. I really like the immutable thing. Do whatever makes you happy…

      • arality@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        UBlue is a tool the fedora team created to build immutable distros in a container. This is a list of official distros created by it. If you’ve seen Bazzite it was also created with UBlue.

        Immutable distro just means the root filesystem is mounted read-only. So when you do updates, they create another image of your filesystem with the updates applied. Then you have to boot into the new filesystem. This is called an atomic upgrade. So if something is broken, you reload your last image and everything is fine.

        • JackAttack@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          Thanks for the explanation. That sounds quite promising. I updated Ubuntu one time and it basically broke a python project environment to where I had to reinstall the previous os again. Then of course reinstall everything else too.

  • los_chill@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    I like having my stable daily driver (currently PopOS) and a separate drive or partition for a rotating distro that may pose more of a learning curve (NixOS right now). So it doesn’t really feel like hopping, more like a stable and a sandbox.

  • kyub@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Distro hopping is fairly normal if you’re still relatively new to Linux, I guess you do it less as time goes on, because you’ll have a better idea of whether or not a specific distro is appealing to you or not. To be able to even judge that you have to try out some distros for yourself, of course, so you need to do some distro hopping in order to tell what “direction” of distro is best for you. Sure you can read about it or watch videos but it’s never the same as actually running it for yourself.

  • Ⓜ3️⃣3️⃣ 🌌@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    It’s normal if you feel like it, don’t care about others opinions too much ;)

    My opinion : far too many distros are « pet distros », a few are actually usable for servers, for desktop as a daily driver and do actual stuff instead of figuring out how to make things work/look pretty.

  • Björn Tantau@swg-empire.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Are you even a real Linux user when you don’t switch distros every day?

    Personally I’m usually content for a long time. Although my ideal distro still doesn’t exist and probably never will with the way the meta is currently going.

    But you do you. You know how hard/easy it is to reinstall so as long as you’re having fun just experiment away.

      • Björn Tantau@swg-empire.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        At the moment I use OpenSUSE Tumbleweed but it’s a little too conservative in my opinion. I can manage it but I miss Debian automatically enabling and restarting services on install/update and management of user groups and other little helpers.

        I’d love to have a Debian based rolling release distro with the same quality control as Tumbleweed. Not Sid, that’s too much tied to Debian Testing’s release cycle and doesn’t get security updates in a timely manner.

        • superkret@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          That used to be my holy grail, too. At some point I realized I do pretty much the same tasks on my PC now that I did 5 years ago.
          So if 5 years of software upgrades don’t change the utility of my PC fundamentally, then I can live with Debian Stable.

          • milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            I like flapjack* for the occasional programs I want the newest version.

            *Sure, autocorrect, let’s call it that now.