• neon_nova@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    4 days ago

    It’s a good use for me. I work with children and the things I’ve “created” have been significantly better thanks to mid-journey.

    Before that it was just generic clip art, now I can make really beautifully themed stuff that was both out of my skill range and price range.

    The artists, would never get money from me since I’m not rich enough to afford it but the children benefit.

    • Feyd@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      4 days ago

      So we’re teaching the children that only high level art is worthwhile and they shouldn’t even try to make at themselves because they suck at it and you can just generate it. Cool.

    • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      How do you define better? More photrealistic? I’d wager kids could learn as much if not more from your own hand-drawn chicken scratch that has a greater emphasis and less distractions on the points you want to convey. They might relate to the lack of conventional quality that they themselves aren’t able to achieve as well. There is an incredible vapidness to AI art. Also it absolutely blows at trying to make anything diagrammatic for teaching. I’ve tried to use it to convey scientic topics that I’d normally use grant funds (back in the day when there were grants) to hire artists to do, and it was an exercise in purified frustration.