• arcterus@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    The goal is basically to prevent end users from using weak passwords and to make it much harder for phishing to occur, both of which IMO are kind of necessary. The vendor lock-in and the slow development of FOSS implementations are not great though. It’s also not great how passkey support on at least Android seems to require proprietary blobs.

    • smiletolerantly@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Bitwarden / Vaultwarden are OSS and work fantastic across all my devices. IMO it’s more convenient than passwords now, ESPECIALLY if you’d have to enter a 2fa code as well.

      • arcterus@piefed.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        IIRC it took them a little while to add support, but I was more thinking of stuff like KeePass. KeePassXC has passkey support, but AFAIK none of the Android apps do yet (although it sounds like KeePassDX is getting close, finally). Also, when I was using Bitwarden, I had issues with some services not liking its passkey implementation (despite being fine with Proton Pass for whatever reason). May be fixed now, but it was incredibly annoying at the time.