• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      453 days ago

      If memory serves, the French invented a huge apparatus for that, inspired by a bread slicer.

    • RubberDuck
      link
      fedilink
      133 days ago

      I’d suggest elevating more federal court justices for a period, durich which time they decide as a group what to take up and then randomly assign 5 or 7 to a case. After their stint they can either return to federal court or retire.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      43 days ago

      they should just require a randomly selected jury for any ruling and the justices only job should be deciding what to present to jurors

      • shastaxc
        link
        fedilink
        93 days ago

        I’m not sure I’d like to trust a random jury to determine the interpretation of laws

          • shastaxc
            link
            fedilink
            52 days ago

            If we’re comparing with the current SC everything is an improvement. But if we’re going to change things, I would prefer a system that does not rely on easily manipulated, uneducated masses.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              2
              edit-2
              3 days ago

              I haven’t heard of a lot of jury tampering trials go well. And usually isnt it more of a mafia style “nice family you got there, would be a shame if something happened to it” situation?