• @[email protected]OP
    link
    fedilink
    161 month ago

    Those stories were his aides saying he was considering he might not run again. He never said it publicly.

    Here Harris is directly stating publicly she wants it legal federally. It’s not a new stance for her. As a senator in 2018 she co-sponsored legislation to make it legal federally

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            71 month ago

            Nowhere in this article Biden says he will Serve only one term. He basically said that it’s an option - nothing more.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    111 month ago

                    There’s no quote from Biden (aka ‘his words’) in the article you linked saying he’ll be a 1 term president. That’s reality.

                  • Ham Strokers Ejacula
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    3
                    edit-2
                    1 month ago

                    Uh huh. Well I read your source and I am unable to find this quote, or anything that supports your original claim. Maybe I am overlooking it? Could you please copy and paste the “words that he said with his mouth” so I can see for myself? Maybe I am too dumb to find them (probable).

                    I am asking in good faith since I don’t want to ascribe blind loyalty to events that do not reflect reality.

                    Edit: video from an interview would work too.

                    Edit 2:

                    I feel good and all I can say is, watch me, you’ll see,” [Biden] told the AP at the time. “It doesn’t mean I would run a second term. I’m not going to make that judgment at this moment.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            81 month ago

            Holy shit you should be fucking so embarrassed. That link literally says, right in the first line, that it is just “reportedly” it’s not him being quoted. It literally confirms what the other poster said and absolutely contradicts what you said.

            It’s okay to be wrong, but fuck man, you shouldn’t of read at least the first line of your sources to make sure they support your claims when you submit them. That’s just mind numbingly dumb.

          • TheLowestStone
            link
            fedilink
            91 month ago

            The Associated Press reported that Biden said in October that he wouldn’t promise to serve just one term but that he wasn’t necessarily committed to running for another four years.

            “I feel good and all I can say is, watch me, you’ll see,” he told the AP at the time. “It doesn’t mean I would run a second term. I’m not going to make that judgment at this moment.”

            You should really read your sources.

      • @[email protected]OP
        link
        fedilink
        11
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        He never explicitly said he would be a one term president or necessarily saw himself as one. I looked back to double check again, and he only made cagey statements about seeing himself as the transition between generations. A two term president could still qualify for that. The more explicit one term stuff was from his aides saying he was considering that

        Should he have just been more direct, yes, but what he said was nothing as explicit as directly stating we need marijuana it to be legalized

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          -61 month ago

          and he only made cagey statements about seeing himself as the transition between generations

          What the fuck else do you think it means to “signal” something in politics?

          • @[email protected]OP
            link
            fedilink
            10
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            However, unlike that Harris isn’t making a cagey statement here. She’s directly stating that marijuana should be federally legalized

            Really the title of this article shouldn’t be signals

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              -81 month ago

              Thats fair. This is more than a “signal”. What people attributed to Biden (you can dig through the articles of the day; it was very clearly taken as a signal he would remain a 1 term president) was a “signal” though, in the pure sense of it. Its a kind of political maneuver that could be a head fake, could be real, you can figure it out later.