• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    5
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    No it makes sense, this post mentions the corruption of the legal system and how wage labor results in the capitalist class having all the power while producing none of the labor. How is that in any way linked with authoritarianism or military action?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -1
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      The part where authoritarians claims to oppose capitalism. There are bad actors who claim the opposite of the outcome of their actions. Thats the nuance of this situation.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        27 days ago

        Still seems strange to comment here, I mean thats a valid argument but this doesn’t seem like the right place.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                17 days ago

                Yeah that doesn’t mean every slightly left wing post is authoritarian, that just comes off as far too accusatory. Shocking news, actual leftists exist on this instance.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  07 days ago

                  I never said the post was improper, I just said be careful and then asked a question that sorts the wheat from the chaff.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    -17 days ago

                    A better question would be do the workers need a vanguard/vanguard party and if so how much power should they hold. Meanwhile opposing Nato is universal for pacifists.