• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    5023 hours ago

    CEOs could maintain control of society while avoiding bad press simply by providing people with what they need—living wages, healthcare, and secure retirement plans. They could still rule while ensuring a fairer system. BUT THEY WONT.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      10
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      No, any CEO that tried to do this would get eaten alive, if not immediately by their board/investors then a bit later by competition from more ruthless ceos. In a capitalist system they literally have no other choice.

      I don’t really see any way to fix it from the inside. Things are going to get a lot worse before they get better, and not by methods they’re going to like. I’m with bill burr here

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        4
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        Worked for Rockefeller. Dude was probably richer than Musk with inflation considered, and practically threw money towards charities (admittedly, using that money to improve cost of living and wages would have been better, but the rich gotta make their hoard still)

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      513 hours ago

      They won’t, because greed doesn’t get punished. Even worse, the law protects money. And the sociopaths/narcissists/psychos are the ones getting rich (of course) and the don’t have empathy, care, or believe in ‘fair’.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1221 hours ago

      living wages

      We should start saying respectable wages instead of living wages.

      Nobody should be living off of beans and rice while there are billionaires in the world.