• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1258 hours ago

    It is impossible to ban piracy. The whole concept is that it’s not legal to begin with.

    I bet Lars Ulrich is so proud that he killed music piracy back when he killed napster.

    Except wait…no he didn’t he killed A service. Meaning singular. The concept of piracy moved on. We got limewire and torrents.

    The ONLY thing that has slowed (if not stopped) music piracy is making the content readily and easily available in a convienent consumption method at a reasonable price.

    Shocking, I know.

    The invention of iTunes CHARGING money for music in a (at the time) new more convienent method of music consumption at a reasonable price did leaps and bounds more to destroy piracy than Napsters downfall ever could.

    Now if only video services would learn this lession. Because it’s the same lession. I don’t know how they missed the memo on this.

    Put your video in one centralized place. Make it hassle free to watch. Charge a reasonable price. Piracy dies overnight.

    And just to prove it, show of hands. Who here would go through the effort and risk of pirating, if Netflix had everything you wanted to watch, for $5 a month? Who here would say no, and still pirate? Reply below and tell me if you would still pirate with those conditions?

    But instead, netflix is pushing $20 a month, and the video hosting is fractured among multiple hosts, all of which overcharge, AND want to serve ads.

    Oh hey, right on cue. It’s a skull and bones flag approaching.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      140 minutes ago

      Video services involve bigger files, subtitles availability, streaming load less evenly spread over hours.

      But I personally think there are ways involving chunk encryption (one key for many users for the same chunk, but not the same key for everyone ; obviously in the end it’s decrypted and decoded at user’s machine, so opportunity for piracy is not avoidable) and something like bittorrent to make commercial video streaming both convenient for users and not such a technical challenge for distributors.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      43 hours ago

      About 10 years ago, I signed up for a seedbox for torrenting purposes. USD 15/month, which was roughly the same as Netflix at the time. Since then, Netflix has repeatedly raised prices, dropped content, and added ads. On the other hand, I’m still paying $15/month for that seedbox, and they’ve upgraded my storage capacity and bandwidth allotment multiple times.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      95 hours ago

      Yep exactly.

      They’ve pushed 6+ services now so it cost that cable used to so people are unsubbing and “cutting the cord” again

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      23 hours ago

      I gind it kind of ironic that if the streaming services were federated and your subscription applied proportionally to the services where you watched different shows this problem would solve itself

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        23 hours ago

        What if they gave you the files, with an easy download button ( with rate limits on downloads per user to avoid mass abuse )? Then, Netflix is basically providing a debrid service, which many people who pirate already pay more than 5$ for. Your VPN for torrenting is likely more than 5$. It’s already trivially easy to rip a movie off a website ( even with DRM ), so this is not a real content control loss for them.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          43 hours ago

          If they offered a service like GOG for movies I think it would be worth it. I don’t have much time for movies though so I actually will buy several films a year on UHD Blu-ray. I only really pirate films that are either out of print or not available in my country on disc.

      • Eyedust
        link
        fedilink
        English
        13 hours ago

        Same tbh. I like having a hard data copy of the things I enjoy, and have pride in my offline music library, which has been neatly filed with all the proper metadata tagged on. Now I can boot up Audacious (Linux) or MusicBee (Windows) and pick the genre I’m feeling that day. Or I can go out for a walk with one of the iPods I’ve restored and leave my phone at home.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      86 hours ago

      Just a subscription that had most of the things and wasn’t a straight up abusive experience would be worth a hell of a lot more than $5. Too bad it will never happen.

      • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮
        link
        fedilink
        English
        7
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        You mean it won’t happen again. Netflix’s goal was never to be good. It was to disrupt the industry. And they’ve succeeded; which is why everything sucks and piracy is a better option once again.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      77 hours ago

      I would pay for the sub, but still seed for my friends in poorer countries where $5 USD is a hell of a lot of money.