

Any day now right?
Any day now right?
But they could release their own installer like CD project Red and other studios do. They don’t want to miss out on the ease of the installer that enables a larger market share. That’s not a monopoly. Literally.
Literally just last week in Philadelphia, guy tried to kidnap a woman and rob the business she worked at.
And then there is all these ones.
We have absolutely set it up so criminals and bastards have a template to follow to hurt others as they want. No rules anymore in America unless it’s about rising up against the lack of rules.
They are literally going around like this in every state and have detained at 51,000 people publicly on the record.
See them Try? They already Do.
Don’t believe what you want that they just haven’t been to the right place to get stopped.
Off topic
That’s most likely just cause they enjoy the auto downloader, patch tools and anticheat software that they can bundle in.
GOG has installers for AAA games like Witcher and Baldurs Gate 3 because the developers were better about giving the option. Heck lots of AAA games on epic. We don’t complain about PlayStation and Nintendo exclusives. Blame the developers for liking the easy features to only be on Steam. Ask them to change not Valve.
Is there a monopoly though?
Other store fronts exist. They are usable and often sell the same games. It’s not Nestle owning half the food options in every food store, this is whole foods, vs all the other grocery stores.
You can get game pass and stream your games and never own them past your subscription lasts.
Or the Microsoft game store which isn’t great but exists.
GOG gives you installers and has big games on it.
Fanatical, GMG, Humble Bundle, are all store fronts.
You could even consider Nintendo and PlayStation to have their own game storefronts while needing their hardware.
Is Steam a monopoly?
Just a modern day freedom absolutist /narcissist, who thinks that it’s unfair they have to live in a world with other people that have their own opinions on things and that actions can have reactions from the fact that we are all existing together in this world.
Honestly same kind of logic as crypto heads and war mongerers who find it annoying others complain about them, burning down the world, because it makes them happier and wealthier.
The idea that world needs to get out of their way to let them do what they want us kinda the whole problem cause you have to empathize with others and so many have decided that’s lame.
Yeah, pretty depressing huh?
Hopefully effort becomes cool again.
I was really interested in VR after trying it a bunch of times and when Microsoft did their whole partnered VR headsets thing they failed so miserably I managed to get one for like $60 brand new.
And then I realized it works well for like an hour tech demo and playing around in short bursts but otherwise is just a TV strapped to your face, hot and sweaty and kinda uncomfortable and your eyes kinda hurt after a while and the games kinda all sucked since no one had a sense of hardware capabilities…
It’s hyper niche and isn’t really for everyone but how could companies argue against a TV strapped to your face.
Yeah! How many times has a religion done this?
And that first one you thought of doesn’t count. Or the next 3 cause those were all recent mass graves. Or those old ones if you thought of those. So just don’t count the first 20 times of this from religions that pop into your head and then tell me how often you really think this happened.
Heretic.
I swear to God if the answer is a shark…
The top 10% with an absolute absurd amount of the wealth are the ones that don’t care. Their miney, therefore their lifestyle seems safe.
The poorest idiots care deeply but think Trump is on their side and will come down to sweep them up right before it gets really miserable cause he needs to break standards of living for all the rich for them to rise up.
What will get people to finally pivot is unknowable. It will be when there is nothing left to lose, probably. If that ever happens without help from the outside, I dunno. It’s not like Germans could Stop Germany from the inside or Japan it’s fascism, or any other group.
But I think it’s wrong to say the average American doesn’t care. The over represented, as always, dont care, which includes out government. The average American agrees deeply we just don’t have much power and all disagree on the solution.
Can I be completely honest? The libertarian contested definition aside the thing that made me realize you were being purposefully obstinate and contrarian for your own giggles was;
While I appreciate USB-C port at the top so you can rest your Switch on your legs and charge it at the same time, that’s not exactly convenient.
Literally the definition of convenient is it being more accommodating or more comfortable or easy to do.
Having 2 ports on either side that charge and do data is incredibly convenient and much better than a singular since charging is a constant of all wireless electronics and this makes that process more convenient.
And then the person you were chatting to responded practically that and you bailed the conversation cause you couldn’t be contrarian.
You are purposefully stubborn and acting in a way that doesn’t make you even different it’s just a similar as always level of self righteous.
No I don’t care about that. I don’t fit in either but actively being rude is not just not fitting in but being purposefully rude.
There is a difference and your refusal to acknowledge that is so that you can avoid having to look at yourself and your actions critically.
You don’t have to change but there are repercussions from the existence of others seeing your actions and if you don’t care about them do not expect others to care about you.
You are not exposing stuff. You are acting like a childish jerk who stubbornly ignores other people for your own sense of righteousness.
Doubling down and refusing to listen to others does not make you a better person in the long run.
Zororo hasn’t stopped the souls coming in to obliterate.
Must be the highlight of it’s day.
And just like that they disappeared to not answer. And if they do it will be with someone they antagonized into saying what they want to prove to themselves their point.
They just wanted to fight against people they thought was morally justified and made a post to make them come to them to do so.
Oh. Neat.
Thanks for the Wikipedia link
Right but that’s an ease of purchase thing. They could buy elsewhere. The option exists, there is no lack of viable options and people still take it. Not by definition a monopoly.
So you are angry that people are lazy and don’t shop around too much. Your issue is with the consumer so you want someone to step in and force them different because you don’t like their actions?