Summary

A firefighting super scooper battling the Palisades Fire in Los Angeles collided with a privately-owned DJI drone, causing significant damage and delaying operations.

The FBI is investigating to identify the drone’s owner, as unauthorized drones near wildfires pose risks to firefighting efforts.

Temporary flight restrictions (TFRs) are in place, but violations can lead to prosecution, fines, and jail time.

The damaged aircraft, one of only two available, is out of service until Monday.

  • TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    That is identical to mine. It’s wicked cool, but I wouldn’t even dream of flying it anywhere near an event like this. I enjoy zipping around my property for sure but that’s it.

    Whoever this is is bigly fucked. They will move heaven and earth to hunt them down.

    • coyootje@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Deservedly so. No-fly zones exist for a reason and many, many people just don’t care about that stuff. Where I live there’s a lot of them and I regularly see people fly drones there.

      I wish they were more strict about fining people here as well, we have an ambulance chopper stationed close by and I don’t even want to imagine it colliding with a drone and crashing in a densely populated neighborhood.

  • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Oh. its a DJI. that thing should have serials stamped all over it; one phone call and boom. they got a name.

    • chunkystyles@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I saved this for later and just tried to watch it. The video is down. I’m curious what this incident is. I fly a paramotor myself.

      • podperson@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Weird - wonder if they keep getting taken down. Here’s one that works (today at least):

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gzzcc6tM3UE

        Drone operator hit a PG at Torrey Pines, PG landed safely (lucky), drone operator approached the pilot to exchange phone numbers but then ran away before info was exchanged. Later threatened the PG pilot with legal action if he didn’t take the video down.

  • dnick@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I feel like any law enforcement official that says anything to the effect of ‘if you do X, you WILL be prosecuted’ is doing a disservice to the entire process.

    Exaggerating or oversimplifying just makes your statements fall flat. When what they mean is ‘If you do X, and we catch you, and we have enough evidence, and the prosecutor decides it’s worth pursuing, and you can’t afford a good lawyer, we WILL (probably) try getting you thrown in jail’.

    Say something simply like ‘We have a x% prosecution rate for this type of crime’ and it makes the risk more real instead of ‘if you do this you WILL be prosecuted’ while everyone who was actually considering doing the thing has either done it a dozen times already, or sees others doing it with apparent impunity.