• DeceasedPassenger@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    Profit share is in the introductory paragraph, and the key, but is not present on any of the email providers. This makes the guide feel unreliable/poorly made. If it’s present to be used in a future version, or referential to other guides, that should be noted to avoid confusion. The purpose of including “Profit share” is unclear.

    • huppakee@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      It could be made clear, but if your comment was a question: it’s because there is no profit-sharing e-mail provider (yet).

      • DeceasedPassenger@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        That’s the inference I made. I should’ve been more clear. I was providing feedback on the clarity of information presented. I would make the edits myself, but am unskilled with editing software, and a simple white-out would look pretty jarring given the positioning. The message (no profit sharing email provider) is still communicated, but sloppily.

  • huppakee@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    I disagree GMX is not in the eco-system tier; they have a calendar, drive app and online office suite. It’s not as extensive as some others but their service includes more than just email.