• masterspace@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    22
    ·
    1 day ago

    Oh yeah, let’s all repeat the playbook of GoG, first you just have to spend a decade establishing yourself as the only publisher able to get former Soviet gamers to pay for games rather than pirate them, then turn that trust that you built with two third party developers into a storefront selling their classic titles for them for 6 years, then use your established customer base and goodwill to try and transition into being a proper AAA storefront.

    Totally viable business strategy /s

    • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Epic has fortnite and the FUCKING UNREAL ENGINE THAT REPLACED THE QUAKE 2 ENGINE FOR BEING USED IN EVERYTHING.

      I think they’re on an even ground.

      • masterspace@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        23 hours ago

        If you’re building a game, and you build it on Unreal engine, so it’s handling literally all of the rendering, development tooling, animation engine, game logic engine, etc. etc. you’ll pay Epic a smaller percentage than you’ll pay Valve for hosting your exe file in cloud storage with some reviews and comments.

        Think 5% vs 30%.

        • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          23 hours ago

          Yeah, sure. Epic recieved 5% of basically 90% of games being released from about 2003 to fuck knows when.

          • masterspace@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            18 hours ago

            Yeah, for building most of those games. Valve has recieved 30% for doing fuck all. Why are you so adamantly defending them?

            • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              13 hours ago

              for building most of those games

              providing an engine does not build the game.

              Valve has recieved 30% for doing fuck all. Why are you so adamantly defending them?

              I’m not defending valve, I’m attacking epic

              • masterspace@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                12 hours ago

                for building most of those games

                providing an engine does not build the game.

                Well good thing I said “most” of a game. Go ahead and write your game logic and then tell me how you get it to render graphics on a screen without any engine code.

                Valve has recieved 30% for doing fuck all. Why are you so adamantly defending them?

                I’m not defending valve, I’m attacking epic

                Yeah, in the context of a discussion about whether or not Valve is overcharging customers.

                Jesus Christ, keep up.