• nik9000@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    22 hours ago

    I worked on a project that was open source and then not and now is. The commhnity is gone. Maybe it’s just because we’re older.

  • recursive_recursion they/them@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    2 days ago

    As someone that’s a major fan of the AGPL-3.0 license, even I have a hard time believing that this would bring people back to Redis.

    It’s an upward battle from here on because they were the ones who chose to demolish their customer’s trust.

  • thingsiplay@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    2 days ago

    Do they expect people, but more importantly organizations and companies, trusting them again? Why would they use Redis over the independent fork Valkey?

    • Max-P@lemmy.max-p.me
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      They’ll stick to Valkey for the license alone. The AGPL is a good license, but the 3 clause BSD license is even more permissive which companies leeching off open-source like a lot more than the GPL licenses.

    • Tja@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Support for one. Very often you need 24/7 support with an SLA for every part of the stack.

      Maybe features? Not familiar with them, but often happens that enterprise features are behind an enterprise license. Stuff like LDAP integration, encryption with KMIP management, Kerberos, etc.

      Third, management tooling. Monitoring, optimization, backups, debugging, what have you.

      Most of the lemmy audience skews to Libre Software, but enterprise land doesn’t care about all of the reasons listed in this thread, they were on the commercial license to begin with.