• Glytch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    So the Institut für Sexualwissenschaft didn’t exist and wasn’t attacked and burned by the Nazis in 1933?

    Trans movements are much older than transphobes think they are.

  • KombatWombat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Women have been wanting comparable rights to men since before written history, yet most people would say the women’s suffrage movement started in the mid 1800s. The original user wasn’t saying trans people didn’t exist until recently, they were likely saying there wasn’t previously any serious effort at accepting them in (American? Western?) society, or at least no where near the magnitude as today. Basic public tolerance may not be good, but it is much better than even just a decade or two before.

    Paris is Burning isn’t a film I had heard about before, probably because it’s older than me and I haven’t been paying attention to queer spaces long. Still, if that user is 45 now, they would be about 10 when it released. Pretty reasonable to not have it on their radar considering it is R rated. Still, they shouldn’t assume trans communities didn’t exist just because they were not aware of any back then. That’s just a mistake.

  • Lad@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    There have always been trans people, there just hasn’t been any trans visibility or acceptance. For a long time, and even still to some extent, presenting as anything other than cishet was very dangerous.

    • Wobble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Absolutely! Though the common usage of transgender or purely trans are more modern - it was usually referred to incorrectly or derogatory as transsexual or travestite which now are being reclaimed.

      I believe for stonewall it was reported as drag queens at the time, very much in line with your visibility and acceptance comment.

        • Soulg@ani.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          And even if he was from the US, the overwhelming majority of people there know nothing about it. It’s certainly not taught in schools.

          Most people these days, I imagine anyway, only find out about it either on the internet or from LGBT circles, and if it never comes up, how do you seek info on something you don’t even know about?

    • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Swiftly followed by Bowie releasing Queen Bitch in 1971 and Lou Reed releasing Take A Walk on The Wild Side in 1972.

      Bowie and Reed were both heavily involved in the New York drag scene at the time.

        • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          Good shout. I’d also argue there’s basically no way to read Bowie’s Rebel Rebel that isn’t about gender fuckery of some kind. I’d argue very strongly that it’s an AMAB character presenting femme.

    • 🦄🦄🦄@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      I just read the lyrics and it doesn’t seem that positive. Am I wrong? It contains for example this line:

      Well, I’m not the world’s most masculine man
      But I know what I am and I’m glad I’m a man
      And so is Lola
      La-la-la-la Lola
      La-la-la-la Lola

  • TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    friendly reminder that THAT HISTORY IS NOT TAUGHT IN AMERICAN SCHOOLS.

    It is literally banned to teach about LGBT topics where I go to school. I was never taught about stonewall at all. Typing this (technically illegally using my phone) in my Gov and Econ senior class.

    • KombatWombat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      It’s more that what’s taught in American schools varies wildly between states, as it’s generally left up to them to determine agendas individually. And schools and even individual teachers are going to choose for themselves how deeply things get covered.

      For me, LGBT involvement was at least acknowledged when we covered the history of the Civil Rights movement. We were also shown a biographical film on the start of the AIDs epidemic when discussing viruses in biology. It made victims look very sympathetic, while the politicians that were uninterested in stopping the spread until it started affecting people outside of gay communities were rightfully depicted as villains. It probably came up in health classes too, but I don’t remember anything distinctly.